
So today Georgia Tech came out and lost a hard fought game to Virginia. Oops sorry, I meant Maryland. Was it just me or was this a serious case of Deja Vu all over again. I really thought I had already seen this game a few weeks ago and sadly the result was the same.
Tech comes out lethargic, sleepwalks through the first half only to find themselves with a serious hole to climb out of in the second half. Then after a hard fought comeback, fall short. Then there were the details. A turnover for us turned into TD for them, happened today, happened against Virginia. Critical penalty on what would have been a game winning drive. Now, then. Even a 4th down play following a scary neck injury. It just kept looking more and more like I had seen this movie before.
There were some positives to take home, the passing game really looked great during the 2nd half, finally. Taylor had several bad throws during the 1st half and the receivers had lobster fingers but they got on the same page and came out strong in the 2nd half. Bennett went 13-16 in the 2nd half with over 300 yards passing for the game. Tashard had over 130 yards on the ground with a TD even while tweaking the hammy again. He likely would have had a second TD when he broke one open and had nothing but farm land in front, only to have to pull up and run out of bounds when the hammy tightened up. I heard Bennett say in the post game interview that the play calling was the same between the 1st and 2nd half he just needed to execute better and that it was all on him. Nice to take the blame TB, but I'm sure he knows the receivers also need to take some responsibility.
Now, I wouldn't be much of a fan or a writer if I didn't take a moment to mention what happened during the last drive. Lets set it up for those who were not there or didn't get to see it unravel on television. The entire 2nd half Tech is moving the ball nearly at will. The play calling was great with a good balance of run and pass. Bennett, the receivers, the O-Line, Choice and Grant were all in sync. After missing the 2 point conversion the score sat at 26-28 and a game winning drive was in the works. Grant picks up a huge 1st down to the Maryland 25 and I felt sure the killer instinct had kicked in. I just knew Tech was going to go for the kill and put 6 up on the board.

What happens next is for you to give a thumbs up as the safe play and good coaching or to second guess until you feel you can finally sleep at night.
Interesting set of numbers I have before me and numbers don't lie. It shows that Bennett's statement from earlier where the play calling wasn't any different is in fact true, until you get to the last drive.
During Tech's 4 second half possessions the play calling breaks down as such:
1st Drive - 3 rushes 5 passes
2nd Drive - 4 rushes 4 passes
3rd Drive - 4 rushes 6 passes
4th Drive - 9 rushes 1 passes
Obviously the 4th and final drive is telling. During the last 5 plays of the last drive we start off at the 25 yard line, well within Travis Bell's range for what would be a game winning field goal and we march backwards. Here is the breakdown of those last 5 plays:
1st and 10 at Maryland 25 Rashaun Grant rush for no gain to the Mary 25.
2nd and 10 at Maryland 25 Tashard Choice rush for no gain to the Mary 25.
3rd and 10 at Maryland 25 Georgia Tech penalty 10 yard holding on Andrew Gardner
3rd and 20 at Maryland 35 Rashaun Grant rush for no gain to the Mary 35.
4th and 20 at Maryland 35 Travis Bell 52 yard field goal MISSED.
You can't help the holding call, it happens and you can never plan for it. It also pushes us back to a 52 yard field goal when Bell's career longest is 51. This is where the question arrives, we have 3 downs to get Travis a few more yards and we get ZERO. Statistically it only makes sense that the shorter distance you have to kick the ball the better your odds are of making the field goal and we get ZERO. I understand that second guessing a football coach might be one of the easiest things to do. I also understand the concept of playing it safe, running the ball to not only protect the ball but run out the clock leaving less time for Maryland to come back down the field and kick a game winning field goal. If Gailey would have continued to toss the ball around when we're well within Bell's range and something would have happened, I don't know say a turnover, then he'd be getting roasted just as hard. What I will say is there has to be a happy medium. Creative play calling that would run the clock, protect the ball, and still get some yards for the field goal. Instead we basically downed the ball 3 straight times and asked a kid to go kick it 52 yard between the uprights.
Here is an excerpt from
Mike Knobler's article in the AJC in which Gailey explains the series of events:
"Third-and-20 from the 35. Tech coach Chan Gailey and offensive coordinator John Bond discuss the situation. They settle on a draw to Grant, which goes nowhere. Bennett has completed 13 of 16 second-half passes and thrown for 309 yards, but they don't want to risk an incompletion. A run, they decide, is sure to gain enough yards to make Bell's kick a near-guaranteed success.
"I really thought if we got him under 50 he'd make it," Gailey said.
Three yards would have done that. The draw was Bond's decision, Bond and Gailey both said, but there was a discussion. They talked about other plays, at least one of them a short-range "possession" pass.
"We were trying in my mind to get 4 or 5 yards, to make it 47 instead of 52 [yards on the field goal]," Bond said. "In our minds, that's what we were trying to get on the draw call. We were thinking in terms of possession pass, but we thought based on all their tendencies they had shown they were probably going to play coverage. We had run the draw earlier, once for 8 [yards], once for 5."
There is that group that says play it very safe, kick it on 1st down at the 25 to make sure you don't have things like the holding penalty or a bad snap, then let your Defense do their job. There are also those that say you play all your cards and don't play it safe, throw the ball and put 6 up on the board. Take your pick, like I said second guessing a football coach might be one of the easiest things to do.

Now listen, I know it looks really bad right now but lets keep things in perspective. 5 of the top 10 teams lost last week, 4 of the top ten lost this week. Which proves two points, Polls don't mean squat and anyone can win or lose at anytime to anyone. Stanford beat USC and they were 40 point underdogs, also USC hadn't lost in the Colosseum since Sept of 2001. Les Miles rolled the dice time and time again against Florida and it paid off, but if those calls backfired on him then Tiger Fans would be calling for his job. Perspective, we need it now more than ever.
I will say what we all know. During the Chan Gailey administration, over the last 6 years, this type of game has become all too common. Seems to happen when they are favored and not to take anything away from Maryland or Virginia, but we have a bad habit of playing down to the level of the competition. The Chan Gailey Equilibrium could in fact rear it's head again (7-5). Honestly at this point I think many of us are just keeping our fingers crossed that we can pull out 4 more wins. It's sad to say because I think this program has been on the rise, recruiting great and bringing more and more talent to The Flats. We could be turning a corner, instead we're going backwards this year, failing to build on our momentum from last years ACC Championship Game run. We all know Tech is a difficult place to win.
So where does that leave us? Just as in the aftermath of the Virginia game there are many calling for Gailey's head on a platter. It's tough, because I think Gailey is a good coach, a good man and finally has a great staff. This program also has good momentum in recruiting. There are many of you saying that Gailey is too involved, muttering around in play calling and that we will never turn that corner until he can just learn to let the staff do their jobs. That he should take a page from the NFL and take a step back and act more like a General Manager. It's his team, he's ultimately responsible so can we really expect him not to be involved, sounds like the play calling at the end was a mutual decision? So what's wrong? Bad luck? Bad coaching? How do we fix it going forward instead of just calling for the coaches job thinking that will make everything better? You tell me?
Regardless of your opinion of the play calling or the coaching staff lets all remember that these kids go out every week and play their hearts out. Literally, blood, sweat and tears. No matter how devastated you may feel at this time just remember that it's 100 times worse for the players and they need our 100% support at all times.
Photo credits: Rick McKay / Washington Bureau, Johnny Crawford / AJC